Amazon PPC Management From $750/Month
Managed for profitable growth — not vanity ACOS.
A low ACOS on a campaign that barely spends is not a win, and neither is scaling a campaign that loses money on every order. We rebuild the account structure, derive a break-even ACOS from each SKU's real margin, and manage bids against that number every week. Flat fee, never a percentage of what you spend.
The same handful of things are usually wrong
Most accounts we open are not badly intentioned. They are accounts where nobody has had a reason to read the search-term report in three months, and the damage is consistent enough to list in advance.
- ✗Auto, broad, phrase and exact all running inside one campaign, so no line of data can be read on its own
- ✗A single account-wide ACOS target applied across SKUs with completely different margins
- ✗Search terms that have spent for months without a conversion, still not negated
- ✗The same keyword bid against itself in three campaigns, pushing your own cost per click up
- ✗Budget sitting on branded terms that would have converted without paying for the click
- ✗Sponsored Brands and Sponsored Display switched on once and never reviewed since
- ✗Bids set from an ACOS benchmark someone read in a blog post rather than from what the unit earns
- ✗Ads still running against SKUs that are out of stock or have lost the Buy Box to a reseller
None of these is dramatic enough to trigger an alarm on its own, and that is the mechanism: ad waste is the one cost in an Amazon P&L that grows automatically in proportion to budget while nobody is looking. Scaling spend on top of a structure that has not been proven profitable at your margin does not fix any of it — it enlarges all of it at exactly the rate the budget grows.
How We Audit the Account
What We Change First
In roughly this order, and usually inside the first two weeks. The sequence matters: bids set before the structure is readable are guesses with more decimal places.
The First 30 Days
Onboarding is the part most agencies describe vaguely, so here is ours by week. Nothing in it depends on you doing anything more than granting access and telling us what a unit costs you.
Days 1–5
Access, audit, and the arithmetic
We take reporting access to Seller Central and the ad account, pull 60 days of search-term and placement data, and ask you for landed cost at whatever resolution you actually have it. By the end of the week you have the audit findings and a break-even ACOS per SKU, with the working shown so you can argue with the assumptions.
Days 6–12
Restructure and reset bids
Auto, broad, phrase and exact get separated so each can be read on its own. Duplicate targets competing across campaigns are consolidated. Bids come off whatever account-wide target was in place and get reset against each SKU's own break-even. Nothing is scaled in this window — the point is to make the account legible first.
Days 13–21
First harvest cycle
The first full pass over search terms since the restructure: converting terms promoted into their own exact-match ad groups and bid properly, terms with spend and no conversions negated at the right level. This is the loop that compounds, and it runs weekly from here on rather than as a one-off cleanup.
Days 22–30
First full report and the honest read
You get spend, ACOS, TACOS and what changed, in plain English, plus our read on what the account can realistically do. If the constraint turns out to be the listings, the price or the inventory rather than the ads, that is what the report says — including in the case where the honest recommendation is to spend less next month.
What We Monitor, and How Often
An Amazon ad account degrades on its own — terms drift, competitors move, a SKU goes out of stock. This is the cadence that stops it, written down so you can hold us to it.
Every week
- ·Search-term report reviewed, new negatives applied
- ·Converting terms promoted to exact match
- ·Bids adjusted on targets that moved materially
- ·Budget caps checked — which campaigns capped, and whether that was right
- ·Advertised SKUs checked for stock-outs and Buy Box loss
Every month
- ·ACOS and TACOS trended together, at account and SKU level
- ·Branded versus non-branded spend split out
- ·Placement and top-of-search multipliers against what they returned
- ·Contribution after ad cost per campaign, using your cost data
- ·Any Amazon fee change that moves a break-even figure
Every quarter
- ·Full structure review — what has drifted since the last rebuild
- ·Per-SKU targets re-derived against updated landed cost and fees
- ·Category CPC drift and what it does to your ceiling
- ·The role of Sponsored Brands and Sponsored Display re-argued
- ·Campaigns that cannot be made profitable named and dealt with
How We Decide What a Click Is Worth
ACOS is a ratio, not a verdict. It tells you what share of ad-attributed revenue went to advertising and nothing about what was left after Amazon took its cut and you paid for the unit. So we do not start from an ACOS target at all — we start from what a sale actually earns you, and derive the target from that.
Referral fees run 8 to 17 percent for most categories and up to 45 percent for Amazon device accessories, and FBA fulfilment fees moved again this year: roughly eight cents per unit on average, plus a 3.5% fuel and logistics surcharge on US and Canada FBA fulfilment fees from April 17, 2026, extended to Multi-Channel Fulfilment on May 2. Amazon puts the US FBA impact at about seventeen cents a unit. Those numbers sit upstream of every bid, which is why we re-derive them per SKU instead of carrying last year's assumption forward.
Worked illustration
Made-up figures, not a client account. Substitute your own and the method is identical.
- Sale price
- $29.99
- Referral fee at 15%
- −$4.50
- FBA fulfilment fee
- −$5.60
- 3.5% fuel and logistics surcharge, charged on the fulfilment fee
- −$0.20
- Landed unit cost
- −$8.00
- Contribution before advertising
- $11.69
- Break-even ACOS — where an extra sale earns nothing
- 39.0%
- At a 26% target, what a sale leaves
- $3.89
Two things follow from that panel. A 35% ACOS still leaves something on this unit and would be a straight loss on a thinner one, which is why a single account-wide target always starves some SKUs while others quietly lose money on every order. And the surcharge is charged on the fulfilment fee rather than on your sale price, so it moves the break-even on heavy, cheap units far more than on light, expensive ones.
Alongside all of that we report TACOS — the same spend measured against total sales, organic included. It is the number that shows whether advertising is buying you rank or just buying sales you would have made anyway. Falling TACOS with rising total revenue is the pattern worth paying for. Rising TACOS with flat revenue means the channel is getting more expensive to stand still in, and we would rather show you that than a tidy ACOS chart.
ACOS vs TACOS
| ACOS | TACOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Formula | Ad spend ÷ ad-attributed sales | Ad spend ÷ total sales, organic included |
| What it measures | What share of the revenue the ads themselves produced went back into advertising | What share of everything you sold went into advertising |
| What it hides | Whether a sale was profitable after the referral fee, fulfilment and unit cost. And whether the ads bought organic rank or only bought sales you would have made anyway. | Which campaigns or SKUs are doing the work. It is an account-level health number, not a bidding number. |
| Reads well when | It sits below the break-even ACOS derived from that SKU's real margin | It falls while total revenue rises: each ad dollar is producing organic sales it does not get credit for |
| Reads badly when | It is compared against a benchmark from a blog post instead of your own margin | It rises while revenue stays flat: the ads are cannibalising demand you already had |
| Where we use it | Per SKU, to set and manage bids against break-even | Per account and per SKU, monthly, to say whether the channel is growing or getting more expensive to stand still in |
Who This Fits — and Who It Does Not
A good fit
An established catalog already selling on Amazon, with enough ad spend for search-term data to mean something, and a landed cost you can give us at some resolution — per SKU ideally, blended across a family is workable. If you want someone to argue with you about which SKUs deserve budget, this is the service.
Probably too early
Spend under roughly $1,000 a month. At that level our fee dominates the channel and the click volume is too thin to optimise against, so you would be paying for judgement there is no data to apply. The honest answer is usually the $495 audit plus your own hours until the channel can carry a management fee.
Not a fit
If clicks arrive and the listing does not convert, PPC management makes that leak more expensive rather than smaller — fix the listing first, or take Amazon Full Management instead. We are also not a fit if you want a guaranteed ACOS, a percentage-of-spend arrangement, or an agency that will never tell you to spend less. Say so now and we both save a call.
What It Costs
Flat fees, excluding the ad spend you pay Amazon directly. Never a percentage of your budget — under that model an agency earns more the more you spend, which makes the one conversation you most need it to have the one it is paid to avoid.
Full PPC Audit
The complete written audit of your existing account: structure, search-term waste, bid and budget allocation, ACOS and TACOS against your real margin, and a prioritised 90-day action plan you can hand to anyone — including a different agency. Credited toward your first month if you hire us within 30 days.
$495 one-time
Amazon PPC Management
Everything on this page, run week to week: structure, bids against your break-even, weekly search-term harvesting and negatives, placement and day-part work, and monthly ACOS and TACOS reporting in plain English.
$750 per month, starting + ad spend
Amazon Full Management
The ads plus the account behind them — listing SEO, A+ Content, Brand Store, catalog and account health. The right choice when the constraint is the listing rather than the campaign, because ads pointed at a neglected listing only spend faster.
$2,000 per month, starting + ad spend
Further reading
All Amazon PPC articles →- Amazon PPC
Amazon PPC Pricing Models: Flat Fee, Percentage, and Hybrid Explained
Brand owners often misunderstand Amazon PPC pricing models and how they drive management decisions. This article breaks down flat-fee, percentage-of-spend, and hybrid models, explains the trade-offs in incentive alignment, and shows what realistic pricing looks like for mid-sized sellers.
- Amazon PPC
Amazon PPC Management Cost: What You Actually Pay and Why It Matters
Amazon sellers often overspend on ads because they lack active optimization or can't afford in-house management. This guide breaks down realistic pricing for agency Amazon PPC management, explains what features actually matter, and shows when the investment pays for itself.
- Amazon PPC
Percentage of Ad Spend vs Flat Fee: Which PPC Agency Model Actually Costs Less?
This article compares percentage-of-spend and flat-fee PPC agency pricing models with specific cost calculations at different ad spend levels. Readers learn which model saves money depending on their budget, how each incentivizes agency behavior, and a framework for deciding which option fits their business.
- Amazon PPC
Amazon PPC Agency vs In-House: How to Decide What Actually Works for Your Brand
This article compares the real trade-offs between managing Amazon PPC in-house, hiring an agency, and building a custom system. It includes cost breakdowns, decision criteria for each option, and when a hybrid approach makes the most sense for scaling sellers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What ACOS should I be targeting?
What is the difference between ACOS and TACOS?
Do the 2026 Amazon fee changes move my break-even?
Will you spend more of my budget every month?
Do I need a minimum ad spend?
Can you also fix my listings?
Last reviewed by the OC Systems Agency team.
The break-even panel on this page is a worked illustration using invented figures, not a client account or a projection. We publish no performance data, and nothing here should be read as a guaranteed ACOS, TACOS, ranking or sales outcome — advertising results depend on your margin, category, listings and inventory, none of which an agency controls.
Find Out What Your Ad Spend Is Actually Earning
Tell us what you sell, what you spend and roughly what a unit costs you landed. We will show you where the waste is and what your break-even actually is — including the case where the answer is that you do not need us.